Radio carbon dating mistakes
Presented here are a few examples, exposing the truth about these stories.
A brief look at the original reference [Vinogradov et al., page 319.]...immediately reveals that the sample was not Pennsylvanian coal at all.
Those wish home dinner date with a medical doctor was trained in the science of radiometric radiocarbon dating does has a few problems.Here once again, we see the remains of mammoths being paraded as evidence for evolution, when quite the opposite is true.I’m somewhat skeptical that describing a CT scan as high-tech is part of some brainwashing campaign.The older an organism's remains are, the less beta radiation it emits because its C-14 is steadily dwindling at a predictable rate.So, if we measure the rate of beta decay in an organic sample, we can calculate how old the sample is. Question: Kieth and Anderson radiocarbon-dated the shell of a living freshwater mussel and obtained an age of over two thousand years.